If your argument were a bridge, implied premises are the missing planks. You might be able to leap across, but your audience won't. Stating the hidden steps in your reasoning turns a risky jump into a walkable path, so people can travel from your reasons to your conclusion without falling through. This is the difference between arguments that persuade and arguments that confuse.
Why Hidden Steps Break Your Arguments
Implied premises are the 'of course' thoughts in your head that never make it onto the page. They often explain why two points belong together. For example, if you say, 'It rained, so traffic was slow,' the hidden step is 'rain tends to slow traffic.' That connection might seem obvious to you, but your reader may question it. The more complex your reasoning becomes, the more critical these connecting steps are. Without them, your argument looks incomplete—like a bridge with gaps that nobody wants to cross.
What Implied Premises Really Are
Think of implied premises as the invisible socks of reasoning—you only notice them when something feels cold and awkward. These are the unstated beliefs or facts that link your evidence to your conclusion. When you leave them hidden, you're asking your audience to make a leap of faith. That might work if everyone shares your background knowledge, but it's a gamble. Different people bring different assumptions to the table, and what seems 'obvious' to you might be genuinely controversial to someone else.
How to Spot the Missing Links in Your Reasoning
Here's a practical technique: after drafting your reasons and conclusion, insert the word 'because' between each step and see if anything is missing. If the link sounds flimsy or jumps too far, write the missing idea as a short premise. For instance:
- Draft: 'Students need better sleep schedules. Therefore, lecture times should change.'
- With 'because': 'Students need better sleep schedules because early mornings disrupt circadian rhythms. Lecture times should change because adjusting them would allow for healthier sleep patterns.'
This doesn't make your argument longer for no reason—it makes it complete. Each added premise strengthens the internal connections that make your conclusion sensible.
The Trust Factor in Complete Reasoning
When you make the invisible visible, your reasoning feels fair and robust. People can disagree honestly because they can see every step. That clarity builds trust, which is often what persuades people as much as the conclusion itself. A fully stated argument invites scrutiny rather than confusion. It shows you've thought things through and you're confident enough to reveal your entire thought process. That transparency is what turns a shaky claim into a walkable bridge.
Building complete arguments takes practice, but it's a skill that transforms how people respond to your ideas. Whether you're writing essays, debating points, or simply trying to convince a friend, stating your hidden premises creates a path others can confidently follow.
If you're looking for support with focus and mental clarity whilst you develop these critical thinking skills, Brainzyme offers scientifically proven plant-powered focus supplements designed to help you think more clearly and stay sharp. Discover how Brainzyme works by visiting www.brainzyme.com.


DACH
FR-BE
US-CAN